新鮮人2021_top banner 980x120 0722a.jpg

[中][ENG] 細說《舞蹈手札》的緣起與早期發展 dance journal/hk: From the Top



不經不覺,《舞蹈手札》已經在香港扎根二十年。從最初僅以黑白影印的方式製作,到今天全彩色印製,還設網上版和延伸錄像,都在歷經不少改變。到底這本今天已成本地舞蹈界廣泛認同的專門刊物,是如何走過這一段廿載長路,當中又有幾多鮮為人知的背後故事呢?這一切就不得不由上世紀九十年代的舞蹈生態說起。


While the past 20 years has slipped by, dance journal/hk has become firmly rooted in Hong Kong. From its beginnings as an entirely black-and-white photocopied edition, to today as a full-color printed periodical with an online version and follow-up videos, the journal has undergone many changes. How has this specialized publication, which has gained industry-wide recognition locally, made it through the past two decades? What are its seldom heard stories? Answers to these questions begin with a look at the dance ecology of the 1990s.


香港演藝學院舞蹈學院於1988年迎來她首屆的畢業生,而香港藝術發展局就在1995年成為法定機構,取代於1980年代初成立的香港演藝發展局,為香港專責策劃、推廣及支持藝術發展的法定機構,推出更多資助的機會,直接刺激1990年代本地舞蹈活動的高速發展。其時,不少由演藝學院早期畢業生創立的舞團相繼出現,而且1997年香港回歸前後的社會氛圍,也催生了更多有關身分的思考,啟發更多創作。然而,當年於主要報章上的舞蹈評論,多數集中談的都是旗艦藝團的作品,又或者是海外舞團來港巡演之製作,對中小型舞團的作品欠缺關注。


The Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts (HKAPA) sent out its first dance graduates in 1988. To replace the Council for the Performing Arts, founded in the early 1980s, the Hong Kong Arts Development Council (HKADC) was established in 1995 as the statutory body to plan, promote, and support the development of the arts. More subsidies were available, directly stimulating the rapid development of local dance activities in the 1990s. At that time, many early graduates from the HKAPA organized dance companies one after another; along with the social ambience regarding the handover of Hong Kong in 1997, many thoughts on our identity and creations were sparked. However, most dance criticism in the mainstream press focused only on the productions of flagship art companies or performance tours of overseas dance companies to Hong Kong, neglecting the productions of small and medium size dance companies.



《舞》的創刊號及第二冊以黑白影印,由第三冊開始有單色封面。 The journal begins as an entirely black-and-white photocopied edition, starting from its third issue, its cover became in 1+1 color.

城市當代舞蹈團(CCDC)的創辦人曹誠淵(Willy),在1990年代就曾經自資出版過一份藝文雜誌《越界》,希望透過辦一份嚴肅認真的刊物,鼓勵更多有關藝術文化的報導,並帶出更多演後之思辯。可是當時的資助機構演藝發展局並不重視,而且提出不同要求,例如不能過於集中談某種風格或演出類型,而是要求不同藝術形式範疇都會作平衡報導,因此制肘甚多。有見及此,同時也為香港舞蹈聯盟(舞盟)創會成員之一的Willy,就提出創立一本以舞蹈為核心的全新刊物《舞蹈手札》。


Willy Tsao, founder of City Contemporary Dance Company (CCDC), self-financed and published a cultural and art magazine, Crossover Magazine, in the 1990s. Through this serious publication, he hoped to encourage more reports on arts and culture, as well as contemplation and discussion after each production. Nonetheless, the subvented organization at that time, which was the Council for the Performing Arts, did not attach great importance to his work, and made various requests impeding its development. For example, instead of attention to certain types of styles or performances, the Council demanded balanced reporting on different genres of the arts. In light of these conditions, Tsao, as one of the founding members of the Hong Kong Dance Alliance (HKDA), suggested creating a brand-new dance-oriented publication, dance journal/hk.


Willy當年的想法是希望製作一份專業的刊物,讀者群不必很多,主要是派發予業界朋友,著重嚴肅及認真的討論與評論。而《舞蹈手札》的另一位草創功臣白朗唐(Tom Brown)也指出,世界各地每個舞蹈發展蓬勃的大城市都總會有一本舞蹈的專屬刊物,因此當時希望香港至少也能夠有一本舞蹈雜誌的出現,創造多一個空間給舞蹈評論刊登,也容讓年輕的獨立編舞作品獲得一定的評論機會,幫助創作人成長之餘,亦能培養更多的舞蹈觀眾。


Tsao intended the publication to be professional. A large readership was not sought, as it was meant for industry practitioners with an emphasis on serious discussion and commentary. According to Tom Brown, another originator of dance journal/hk, in every major metropolis around the world where dance thrives, there is a publication devoted exclusively to dance. Therefore, he hoped for such a publication in Hong Kong to provide more room for commentary about dance and space to review the works of young independent choreographers, furthering the growth of creators and nurturing dance audiences.


時任編輯Willy在199年創刊號封面上的編者話提及「手作過程」,城市當代舞蹈團、香港演藝學院、香港芭蕾舞團、香港舞蹈團都參與出版過程。 In the editor’s note of the journal’s initial issue in 1999, its first editor, Willy Tsao wrote about the “domestic process” in producing the journal. City Contemporary Dance Company, Hong Kong Academy of the Performing Arts, Hong Kong Ballet, Hong Kong Dance Company also participated in the publication.


由創刊號開始,《舞》已為讀者提供舞蹈界消息和節目資訊,一直至今。 Since its first issue, the journal has been providing dance news and events information to its readers and continues until today.

至於刊物的中英文名稱《舞蹈手札》與dance journal/hk的由來,其實也有過不同的考慮。Willy憶述當年構思名稱時,主要是希望可以突出舞蹈主題,而又不會太過學術,曾考慮過以《非常舞蹈》為中文刊名,不過經討論後,還是選擇了平實一點的《舞蹈手札》,感覺簡單低調得多。至於英文名字,Tom就認為journal(日誌)一詞較magazine(雜誌)嚴肅,雖然journal也有期刊的意思,但名字所形容的其實是不太學術的日誌;而全部以小階及作「/hk」的呈現,也多少源於當時有紐約設計師,用小寫及斜號的形式作品牌名字,故啟發到他們有此想法,決定順應潮流。


There were a lot of considerations regarding the Chinese and English names of the journal. Tsao recalls that when he tried to name the journal, his main concern was to make the theme of dance stand out in a non-academic way. After discussion, in the end, a simple and low-profile name was preferred《舞蹈手札》to《非常舞蹈》as the Chinese title. As for the English version, Brown reckoned that the word journal had a bit more weight than magazine. Although journal shares the meaning of periodical, what it implies is in fact a less scholarly diary; moreover, it was decided to have the title all in lower case letters with a tag of “/hk”. This decision was partially inspired by fashion designers of that time, who similarly tagged the initials of their cities to their brand names.


第二年開始參與設計及排版,後來也有參與編務工作的施德安(Cecil)就提到,當時的香港演藝界雖然已經開始對評論有關注,但卻未見有專門的評論雜誌出現,更沒有全職的評論人。即使在1998年曾經有一個資金,讓《打開》得